Τρίτη 17 Νοεμβρίου 2015

How Abenomics and Monetary Policy Tools is not effective


Japan’s economy reported another round of recession as the country reported a prolong period of no economic growth, or stagnation. The Bank of Japan said there will be no further easing of monetary policy. The economy shrank almost 1% in the third quarter. Despite the easing of monetary policy, consumers and businesses did not respond by spending more, thus boosting GNP.
 

Slow growth in China and dim prospects led to Japanese companies held back in spending. Consumer confidence and the economic conditions did not help in the direction of business spending. Despite the promises of the easing of monetary and fiscal policies, the climate was quite the opposite, thus business investing was reserved.

Stagnation is where an economy grows below potential, and is at a point of recessionary gap. Inflation may be low but unemployment is high. When an economy is at this point a government has at its option to provide fiscal policies that would get the economy grow above potential, and the central bank also has at its disposal, tools to influence the money supply, and ultimately interest rates.
 

What has happened with Japan is that Prime Minister Abe can to power at a point when Japan was at a turmoil. In 2008 the Nikkei dropped more than 40% along with negative GDP growth rates. This led to drastic reforms of the Japanese economy. When Abe came to power in 2012, his economic policies called for drastic changes. These were reforms in a more aggressive monetary policies, structural reforms and proactive fiscal policies.
 

Although these policies were implemented, or partial thereof, they did not brought the awaited changes. During 2013 the bank of Japan implemented Quantitative Easing, and announced the purchases of Japanese bonds. Its target was to reach an inflation rate of 2%. This is the single mandate that most central banks have. By purchasing bonds, the central bank’s idea was to pump money into the banking system, thus allowing commercial banks to increase lending, encourage investments, and thus increase aggregate demand.
 

Although these policies had an effect on government spending, (increasing infrastructure spending on public schools and roads) it also increased borrowing, adding to the surmounting public debt. The ratio of debt to GDP was 240%. Further quantitative easing leads to a weak currency. This may be good for exporting goods, but for Japan, which is a country that imports energy, a weaker yen may have adverse effects, since it will have to pay more. Exports in 2014 grew only 4.9%.